marlowe1 writes:
> There is the Freudian belief that homosexuality is a phase that one
> goes through on the way to heterosexuality. It's a belief that
> automatically turns people's stomachs no matter what their beliefs are
> concerning sexuality. Homophobes will loudly protest that they NEVER
> had a crush on their gym teacher when they were 7. Homosexuals know
> that they aren't "just going through a phase" as their mothers would
> like to believe (met one guy with a double male symbol tattooed to his
> arm. He said that when his mom saw that she said "Do you really think
> you're going to be gay all your life?" and he was like "well, yeah.")
> 
> And like any universally despised theory, there is just enough truth to
> it to make people really nervous (else they wouldn't be so quick to
> condemn it). Why else do 12 year old girls buy into bands made up of
> extremely un-masculine men such as N'Sync or New Kids on the Block (or
> Andy Gibb or...)?
> 
> Bisexuals represent a kind of proof that that theory does have merit -
> at least in the eyes of people that would think about it. Since the
> theory automatically implies that everyone has homosexual and
> heterosexual urges, someone that admits to having homosexual and
> heterosexual urges (and not only that - acts upon them) makes the
> people that don't want to admit to their homosexual (or heterosexual)
> urges very uncomfortable.
> 
> That and after decades of getting people to call it sexual orientation,
> bisexuals come along and bring it back to sexual preference.


Thank you for posting a "everyone is bisexual" post. I haven't had a
chance to flame someone for being ignorant in a long time.

People that say "everyone is bisexual" are trying to make bisexuals
disappear. If "everyone is bisexual" then bisexuality doesn't need to
be talked about. If "everyone is bisexual" then we can ignore
bisexuals, pretend they don't exist, and forget about them.

The reality is that bisexuals do exist. And guess what? The gay and
lesbian community should be scared.

You see, everyone thinks that bisexuals are just part of the g/l
movement. They aren't. Yes, our legislative goals overlap, but only
because you don't know us well enough. The reality is that you should
be so damn scared of bisexuals that if you threw away your Freudian
theories and picked up on the academic and political writings from THIS
CENTURY you'd be unable to sleep at night.

Let me put it in simple terms. The g/l movement is dead meat and when
they self-destruct, the bisexuals will rule.

The g/l rhetoric has, since the 1970's, stated "we're born this way"
and begged for protections based on that. "We can't change it! Poor
poor us! We're so fucked up we need government protections!"

The problem with this argument is that it is self-hating. "Oh poor,
poor us!" is like saying "If we weren't defective we'd be straight
'cause straight is great!"

In the next 10-20 years genetic research will find the cause of
homosexuality is... oh shit... wait... there isn't really a genetic
cause... because homosexuality doesn't completely exist it's a social
construct and ... well, there's this one gene, no... a pair... no... a
group of genes and they don't "cause" homosexuality they just are an
indicator... like having a certain gene doesn't give you MS, it just
makes you're more likely to get it. And there are social factors. What
you eat, how you live. Oh shit! Homosexuality isn't a concrete thing
that can be measured! If it can't be measured it can't be proven and if
it can't be proven we can't make laws about it!

And slowly over time, all this "born this way" legislation will
crumble. One my one the courts will overturn bits and pieces until they
might as well not exist.

And all those self-hating homosexuals that cried "poor me! poor me! i'm
a defective human" will be so embarassed about the badly written
legislation that they passed.

And someone will realize that for decades the g/l community as been
ignoring anthropologists who have been pointing out that "gay" an an
identity only exists in the US and Europe. It is a completely foreign
concept in latino and african cultures... who have same-sex sex
activity that is not anything like what "the west" refers to as "being
gay". Oops! That's what you get for ignoring hundreds of social
scientists when making over-reaching claims about genetics. Oh the
embarassment!

And then the bisexuals will pull out all the articles and thesis'
written in the 1990s and 2000s that refused to be self-hating and
instead said, "We're fucking who we want, because freedom means we
should be able to do that. We're loving who we want because freedom
means we should be able to do that. Pursuit of happiness and all that,
damn it!"

Non-genetic things can be protected as "civil rights": Things like
religion, political party, military status, and such.

And then we'll pass laws that don't say, "us poor homosexuals are
defective, and need protections based on genetics" but "we're proud bi,
non-bi, non-labelling, and kinsey this and kinsey that and kinsey all
over the place and we deserve civil rights because we should be able to
make a CHOICE. Yes, some of us feel it's biologically determined, but
its their right to CHOOSE to feel that way." And we'll write
legislation that is in the same vein as laws that protect people for
having made the choices that they want (like religion, military status,
etc.).

Because true sexual freedom means being able to follow your preferences
whether that's because its your orientation or just 'cause it feels
right.

Which leads me to an interesting little note. Once bisexuals have taken
over, we'll laugh and say things that make gays invisible. Because in
reality, real gays are something like 1-2% of our world. Such a small
percentage, making you invisible will be easy. Bisexuals are more like
90% of the world. We rule! When people try to come out as "gay" we'll
just smile knowingly and say, "everyone's a little gay" and make them
feel like shit.

But for now, we'll just ignore you. Mister Tim Lieder. Starting...
right... now!